Saturday, March 1, 2014

Double-Entry Log Entry for the article "The Tipping Point"

3 March 2014

Gladwell, Malcolm. “ TheTipping Point.” 2000. Back to the Lake. Ed. Thomas Cooley.2nd ed. New York: Norton, 2012. 675-81. Print.

New Yorker feature article in journalistic style.

 Malcolm Gladwell develops a great theory of how epidemics, other than diseases, in every-day life stem but he even admits others have other explanations for the events taken place.

The 3 characteristics of a social epidemic                                                   

-I disagree with this theory because where is the science behind this

“the idea that epidemics can rise and fall in one dramatic moment  ̶  is the most important, because it is the principle that makes sense of the first two”                  
                       
- I would like to argue how this does not apply to all occurrences ( athletes, music)

In the article Gladwell talks about how human behavior plays a role in social epidemics                                                                         
                          
-he doesn’t explain what can cause us to react in that certain manner

His story depicting the crime rate in New York                                            

-poorly explained, uses angle of vision

"Within five years, murders had dropped..."                    
                                
-what happened in those five years. 

Gladwell states that others have different reasoning behind the crime epidemic in New York                

 -makes me question the theory’s logic

He ends with two questions   
                                                                   
-made me question if his theory made any logical sense

1 comment:

  1. This looks like a good, solid start. Here are a few things for you to consider as you revise your final draft:

    You've got the right idea for your thesis, but I want you to structure it slightly different for this particular paper. For this paper your thesis should answer the following questions: Is Gladwell's article effective, successful, persuasive (or not) for his target audience? In other words, does he succeed in persuading his target audience? How does he succeed (or not)? Why does he succeed (or not)? Does Gladwell use logos, pathos and ethos in his article? Does this contribute to his success? Where do we see examples of his use (or lack of) logos, pathos and ethos in the article?

    If you can answer these questions in your thesis, you will have a stronger, more organized thesis that will forecast where the rest of your paper is going to take your readers.

    Let me know if you have questions or concerns about this. I am happy to discuss it with you more.

    ReplyDelete